By Abba Dukawa
In a democracy, public scrutiny of those in office is not merely a right—it is a necessity . That scrutiny,, must rest on verified facts, due process, and proper context, not on speculation, biased narratives, or political agendas . This scrutiny aims to set the record straight, guided by evidence, institutional integrity, and the nation’s long-term interest . It’s a fair approach to inform citizens and promote transparency…
It is striking how events unfold in this country, especially when self-serving individuals with dubious motives go to great lengths to undermine a rising public servant. They politicize every aspect of his actions, while like-minded supporters interpret each development through a partisan lens, turning even neutral events into political controversies.
Insecurity affects everyone, irrespective of political affiliation, and its consequences are devastating. It should be a matter of serious concern for all citizens. The exploitation of security challenges for political gain is alarming, troubling, and ultimately counterproductive.
The escalating, orchestrated controversy surrounding Bello Matawalle raises critical questions about how to distinguish fact from politically motivated narratives amid intensifying tensions. Despite this counterproductive approach, self-serving individuals are deliberately misleading the public by blaming Bello Matawalle for Zamfara’s insecurity. The state was already plagued by banditry, displacement, and kidnapping long before his tenure. Upon taking office, Matawalle implemented a multi-layered approach that included security operations, dialogue, community engagement, and intelligence-led interventions. He also supported security agencies by procuring over 200 Hilux vehicles to enhance their operational capacity.
About The Author
