October 19, 2026
Screenshot_20240417_121731~2

By Our Reporter

The Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital has issued an interim injunction, ordering the maintenance of the status quo over the extension of tenures for elected local government council officials.

The order was consequent to the recent decision taken by the House of Assembly to amend the Local Government Law Number 5 of 2018, aim at elongating the the tenures of elected chairmen and councilors.

On the reason behind the amendments, Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly,Martin Amaewhule stated that the laws were intended to empower the House of Assembly to extend the tenures of elected officials when it is deemed impracticable to hold local government elections before the expiration of their three-year terms.

However, the court ordered all parties involved to maintain the status quo ante pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for the interlocutory injunction.

In a suit filed by the Executive Chairman Enyiada Cooky-Gam of Opobo-Nkoro, Anengi Claude-Wilcox of Bonny, and five other elected council officials challenging the decision of the Amaewhule-led House of Assembly to extend the tenure of local government areas, Justice G.N. Okonkwo, who presided over the matter also directed the claimant/applicant to enter into an undertaking to indemnify the defendants with a sum of N5 million should the substantive case be deemed frivolous.

The defendants in the suit include the Governor of Rivers State, the Government of Rivers State, and the Attorney-General of Rivers State.

The claimants/applicants are seeking declarations that under section 9(1) of the Rivers State Local Government Amendment Law number 5 of 2018, the tenure of office of the chairmen and members of the 23 local government councils of Rivers State is three years. They are also seeking injunctions to prevent the extension of the tenures beyond their designated period.

Meanwhile, the court has scheduled April 22, 2024, for hearing the motion on notice for the interlocutory injunction and issued an order of substituted service of relevant legal documents to the defendants.

About The Author

invitation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *